IIIM Magazine Online, Volume 4, Number 35, December 18-25, 2002 |
THE VIRGIN
BIRTH:
A MYSTERY TO
BE CRIED ALOUD
by John Hartog III, TH.D.
Reprinted by permission of Faith Baptist Theological Seminary's Faith Pulpit, December, 1999.
The virgin birth refers to Mary's miraculous conception of Christ through the power of the Holy Spirit, without any male participation, so that, though the birth process was not unlike that of other humans, Mary was still a virgin when Jesus was born. This Biblical doctrine should be distinguished from the Roman Catholic tenets of Mary's immaculate conception and her perpetual virginity (Erickson, 179).
The Dogma of the Immaculate
Conception
According to the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, Mary
was "preserved free from all stain of original sin" (Ott, 199). Since she was
subject to the necessity of original sin, she stood in need of redemption; but
since she was redeemed from the moment of conception, she was thereby preserved
from original sin. Her redemption, therefore, according to this dogma, was more
perfect than that experienced by any other human. The dogma was proclaimed by
Pope Pius IX on December 8, 1854, and a Biblical basis for the belief is argued
from texts such as Genesis 3:15 and Luke 1:28, 41. Reading these passages, one
is left at a loss as to how such a doctrine could find Biblical support were it
not for underlying Marian presuppositions.
The Dogma of the Perpetual
Virginity
The Catholic tenet of the perpetual virginity of Mary
holds that she was "a Virgin before, during and after the Birth of Jesus Christ"
(Ott, 203). Accordingly, Mary was not only a virgin at the conception and birth
of Jesus but remained so throughout her life. According to the Catechism of the
Catholic Church "the deepening of faith in the virginal motherhood led the
Church to confess Mary's real and perpetual virginity even in the act of giving
birth to the Son of God made man. In fact, Christ's birth "did not diminish his
mother's virginal integrity but sanctified it." And so the liturgy of the Church
celebrates Mary as Aeiparthenos, the "Ever-virgin" (CCC, 499). Catholics
officially promulgate the idea that "Mary bore her Son without any violation of
her virginal integrity" (Ott, 205). A few, the Schoolmen in particular,
theorized that Jesus' birth did not pain Mary, nor did it nullify her "physical
virginity." For the Schoolmen, then, Jesus was born miraculously in a way
analogous to His emergence from the sealed tomb or to His going through the shut
doors (i.e., Jesus was born directly through Mary's abdominal wall). The
Scriptures, on the other hand, describe Mary as the one who "brought forth" her
Son; they say nothing about a miraculous birthing of Jesus.
Magisterial Catholic theologians propound the concept that Mary remained a virgin after Jesus' birth. For Augustine and others, Biblical support for this comes from an inference based on Luke 1:34, where Mary's question is taken as "a resolve of constant virginity on the ground of special Divine enlightenment" (Ott, 207). Others look to John 19:26 and infer that Mary had no other children but Jesus. However, the aggregate voice of Scripture contradicts the dogma of perpetual virginity with the repeated mention of Jesus' siblings: Matthew 12:46, 13:55; Mark 6:3; John 2:12, 7:3-5; Acts 1:14; and Galatians 1:19. In addition, Matthew 1:25 could hardly be clearer on this point: Joseph "knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son." The words till (see also 1:18) and firstborn (see also Luke 2:7) provide a double proof against the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary. It is of little wonder that one Catholic catechism reads, "The perpetual virginity of Mary is not revealed truth which can be clearly demonstrated from the New Testament without the light of tradition" (Lawler, 107).
The Biblical Doctrine of the Virgin
Birth
Therefore, we reaffirm the Biblical doctrine that Mary
conceived Jesus by the Holy Spirit apart from the cooperation of man and that
Mary was most certainly a virgin when He was born, although Jesus' birth was not
unlike that of other humans. Two primary Christmas passages further explain this
Biblical doctrine.
The first passage, Matthew 1:18-25 indicates that Mary's pregnancy was due to the activity of the Holy Spirit (1:20). It also indicates that Mary remained a virgin until she gave birth to Jesus (1:25). The other passage, Luke 1:26-38, teaches that Mary was a descendant of King David and that she was a virgin (1:27). After the angel told Mary that she would bear the Son of the Most High, Mary asked a perfectly logical question, "How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?" (1:34). The angel answered, "The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee;" for this reason, Mary's holy Offspring would be called the Son of God (1:35).
The Modernist Denial of the Virgin
Birth
Modernist theologians feel that the doctrine of the
virgin birth is not important; they conclude that the doctrine of the virgin
birth is a theologoumenon, i.e., a story reflecting the faith of the early
church in its attempt to reinforce its Christological myths. Most treacherous
are those Modernists who claim to hold the doctrine of the virgin birth, though
they actually deny it by redefining the term as a reference to the incarnation,
with no affirmation of the biological virginity of Mary. Contrary to the
liberals' condescending dismissal of the doctrine, we reaffirm the importance of
the doctrine and its integral position in a Biblically-based systematic theology
(see EDT, 1143-45).
The Virgin Birth and
Scripture
The doctrine of the virgin birth is closely tied to the
truthfulness and authority of Scripture. If one denies the virgin birth, then
one is denying the straightforward teaching of the Bible. If one denies the
virgin birth, then he must conclude that the Bible is not telling the truth and
that it lacks authority in this area of doctrine. Machen wisely observed that
"if the Bible is regarded as being wrong in what it says about the birth of
Christ, then obviously the authority of the Bible, in any high sense, is gone"
(Machen, 383).
The Virgin Birth and the Deity of
Christ
The doctrine of the virgin birth is also linked with
belief in the deity of Christ. Frame writes, "While we cannot say dogmatically
that God could enter the world only through the virgin birth, surely the
incarnation is a supernatural event if it is anything. To eliminate the
supernatural from this event is inevitably to compromise the divine dimension of
it" (EDT, 1145; see also Machen, 387-92).
The Virgin Birth and the Humanity of
Christ
Similarly, the truth of the virgin birth is connected to
the doctrine of the humanity of Christ. The Apostle Paul alluded to this truth
when he wrote that Jesus was "born of a woman" (Galatians 4:4). Ignatius, a
second-century martyr, argued forcefully against the Docetists, whom he called
"certain unbelievers," by stressing that Jesus truly was of the Davidic line,
that He was truly nailed to the cross, that He truly suffered, and that He truly
rose from the dead. Ignatius was also "fully persuaded" that Jesus Christ was
"truly born of a virgin" (AF, 156-157).
The Virgin Birth and the Sinlessness of
Christ
Having been born of the virgin Mary, Jesus was human
Offspring. Having been conceived of the Holy Spirit and overshadowed by the
power of the Most High, Jesus was holy Offspring—the sinless Son of God.
Therefore, the doctrine of the virgin birth impacts one's view of the
sinlessness of Christ. When Mary "conceived, she passed on her human nature to
the theanthropic person, but she was prevented by the Holy Spirit from
transmitting a sin nature" (Gromacki, 125).
The Virgin Birth and the Promised
Messiah
The doctrine of Jesus as the Christ, or Messiah, also
depends upon the virgin birth. The Messiah was promised to come as a descendant
of King David (2 Samuel 7:16; 1 Chronicles 17:14; Psalm 89:3-4, 26-37; Isaiah
9:7; Matthew 9:27, 12:23, 20:30, 21:9, 22:41-45; Luke 1:32-33; see also Ezekiel
34:23-24). In fulfillment of these promises, Jesus was born "the son of David"
(Matthew 1:1,6). The Old Testament, however, not only portrays the Messiah as a
descendant of David, but also mentions a curse against all of David's royal seed
descending through the line of one of Judah's final kings. This king was
Jehoiachin (also known as Coniah), and his wicked reign is described in 2 Kings
24:8-17 and
2 Chronicles 36:9-10. He was so wicked that God pronounced a curse against him: "No man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah" (Jeremiah 22:30). This presents a problem because, though Jesus' lineage traces back to David and Solomon (Matthew 1:6-7), according to Matthew, Jesus' lineage comes through the cursed "Jechonias'" (Matthew 1:11). The virgin birth provides the wonderful solution to this dilemma. Matthew records Jesus' legal genealogy through Joseph, His adopted father (Matthew 1:16), and so Matthew establishes Jesus' legal right to the throne of David. Luke, on the other hand, records Jesus' biological genealogy through Mary. Mary too was a descendant of David, but not through Solomon and Jehoiachin. Instead, her line traces back to a son of David through a different son, Nathan (Luke 3:31). In the sovereign plan of God, the Messiah has the legal right to David's throne without its accompanying curse.
The Virgin Birth and
Salvation
The doctrine of the virgin birth is also closely tied
with our own salvation. If Jesus had been tainted with sin, then He could not
have been our sufficient Sacrifice. On the other hand, if Jesus had not been
born of Mary, and so had not been the Man, Christ Jesus, then He could not have
died, nor could He have been a suitable sacrificial substitute as a Man for men.
Christ became human in a miraculous way. The provision of salvation, therefore,
is all of God and none of man.
It is clear, then, not only that the Bible does teach the doctrine of the virgin birth and that this doctrine differs from Catholic teachings, but it is also clear that the doctrine of the virgin birth is an integral element of orthodox theology. The virgin birth touches upon the doctrines of Scripture, Christ, and salvation. For this reason, we reaffirm our belief in this doctrine, we teach it, and we call on others to do the same. It is a doctrine that should be proclaimed—especially during the Christmas season. Ignatius wrote of "the virginity of Mary and her child-bearing and likewise also the death of the Lord" as "three mysteries to be cried aloud" (AF110,141-142). We firmly believe that Jesus was born of the virgin Mary. Throughout the year, but especially during this Christmas season, let us cry it aloud!
AF= The Apostolic Fathers: Revised Greek Texts with Introductions and English Translations. Edited by J. B. Lightfoot and J. R. Harmer. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1984 reprint.
CCC = Catechism of the Catholic Church. United States Catholic Conference, Inc. New York: Doubleday, 1994.
EDT = Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Edited by Walter A. Elwell. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1984. S.v. "Virgin Birth of Jesus," by J. M. Frame, pp. 1143-46.
Erickson, Millard J. Concise Dictionary of Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1986.
Gromacki, Robert G. The Virgin Birth: Doctrine of Deity. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1981 reprint.
Lawler, Ronald, Wuerl, Donald W., and Lawler, Thomas Comerford. The Teachings of Christ: A Catholic Catechism for Adults. Second edition. Huntington: Our Sunday Visitor, 1983.
Machen, J. Gresham. The Virgin Birth of Christ. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1965 reprint.
Ott, Ludwig. Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma. Translated
from the German by Patrick Lynch. Edited in English by James Canon Bastible.
Rockford, IL: Tan Books, 1974 reprint.
Original version of this article may be found at http://www.faith.edu.